Organizational Behavior & Management-Free-Samples for Students

Questions: 1.Would workers in Australia, America or Europe accept the Taylorism in this form today? 2.Consider the design of scripts for use in Call Centres, can you see Taylorism in that? Explain. 3. This clip is showing history from 100 years ago. Some would say that the world has moved on and these ideas are out of date. However, could there be parts of the world today for which these ideas might be just what they need? Explain. 4.What would be some of the key drawbacks or risks of living in the flat world of Globalisation 3.0 as Friedman describes it? 5.Do you agree with Friedmans iron rule of the flat world? Explain. 6.Is the level of globalisation uniform across the world? Explain. Answers: Taylorism and Ford Introduction The concept of Taylorism is not used directly by most companies in the world. However the concept has not been lost or totally rejected. Organizations apply the theories when certain situations arise within the organizational culture. Also other organizational theories in combination with Taylorism are applied in order to increase the labor force and enhance the organizational performance. 1.In the contemporary world the management and leadership do not engage in the practice of Taylorism in their organizations. The workers in the developed countries like Europe, Australia or America do not practice Taylorism in its primitive form. It is not like that all the organizations have totally rejected a concept like Taylorism; it is still in the organizational culture in a modified or varied form. The management applies various strategies and other theories wit Taylorism to make it more applicable in the contemporary organizational work flow (Waring 2016). One can take examples of retail or insurance business where Taylorism is still applied in combination with digital technologies or ergonomics. In the original form the employers were the key drivers of the Taylorist practice, the authoritative power let them control the labor in a strict manner by this practice, because their only aim was to maximize the productivity by controlling the workers. The belief that Taylorism is managements only way of controlling the labors to make them produce most and ignoring the employee concerns became obsolete (Nyland, Bruce and Burns 2014). The concept of Taylorism is losing its relevance in the contemporary business practice because it sees money is the only factors that run an effective organization. The charity based organizations are such examples where the idea of Taylorism is not applicable at all. On the other hand, there are cases where Taylorism becomes an important option for the organization to improve the productivity. If the organization is performing poorly or labors are not working as much as they are supposed to, then the organizations tend to adapt few strategies from Taylorism. 2.Taylorism and later Ford developed the concept in order to maximize the labor output. Originally Taylor reexamined and rationalized the existing labor work force by monitoring the worker performance for a long time and developed the idea. Later Ford incorporated economic inducements and increased the labor productivity in his car manufacturing business. There are organizations that still use the Taylorism in their business successfully, Call Centre business is one of them. To run a Call Centre business the management has to instruct the employees what exactly they have to do and no creativity or examination is appreciated (Schermerhorn, 2013). It is even visible in countries like India (Sinha and Gabriel 2016). There the employers with the help of Taylorism maintain the productivity by constantly monitoring the workers. 3.In todays world, the application of Taylorism is based upon the product and size of the organizations. McDonalds is one of such companies that apply Taylorism successfully in ceratin parts of its international business market (Babajana and Webber 2015). In India the management applies Taylorism successfully in order to control a large number of workers so that they can serve maximum number of customers in short period of time (Sinha and Gabriel 2016). Globalization Introduction The globalization has changed the world dynamics by increasing the interaction level among the nations, organizations and humans at a large level. The business process has changed and developed and most countries are working their best to utilize the opportunities that globalization has created in the global market. 4.There are many advantages which the citizens access from living on the common platform of flat world. However there are the following advantages that the citizens, organizations or the nations suffer from as well: Though Friedman suggests all the nations are connected and somehow feel or act in a similar way, but every culture s different and every individual person act or think differently in the world. A common international business ethics affects the organizational performance, so they select the options which are most suitable for them. The organizations leave their home countries from the developed world as their freedom has been reduced because of the business ethics. The rise of multinational companies in the developing countries proves that. The flat world is based on the idea that there are no borders or boundaries. It can result in the nations o organizations to build their own rules for business. 5.After analyzing Friedmans globalization theory I do agree with the iron rule of flat world. the nations or individuals around the world interact more than ever now. In the flat world, anyone can interact with anyone at anytime, so the preexisted societal, political, economic, geographical frame experienced in an extensive integration and transformed the world flat (Friedman 2004). In the twenty first century the globalization increased individuals power as now everyone is capable of controlling the business in a flat world. The globalization in the flat world unified the nations, organizations and individuals all over the world. Because of the iron rule of the flat world the organizations or nations or organizations perform or manage their business by the iron rule. 6.No, the globalization is not uniform across the world. In many nations the aspects like export, direct investment, communication and immigration running against the concept. Most countries are careful about the penetration of Globalization in their society or business. As Ghemawat suggests that the nations never let the globalization affect their individual cultures. The developed a mutual space where their own culture is retained and the globalization is active as well (Guillotin and Mangematin 2015). Conclusion If the organization is capable of identifying the most relevant elements from the Taylorism and applies it to control certain situation within the organizational work force, the productivity can be increased. In most developed countries the workers do not accept it as it affects their concerns, but in underdeveloped countries with huge labor force it can prove to be a really effective strategy. Friedmans concept of flat world is highly appreciable because of its direct implication in the real world. Nations are interacting with each other in order to maximize the business. However the concept is applicable in all the nations in equal measure. There are countries that do not adapt the concept in its entirety. They developed a harmony between the local culture and globalization. Reference Babajana, Z. and Webber, A., 2015. Organisational Behaviour. Nyland, C., Bruce, K. and Burns, P., 2014. Taylorism, the international labour organization, and the genesis and diffusion of codetermination.Organization Studies,35(8), pp.1149-1169. Parker, L.D., 2016. The global Fayol: contemporary management and accounting traces.Entreprises et histoire, (2), pp.51-63. Schermerhorn, J.R., 2013.Management. John Wiley Sons. Sinha, S. and Gabriel, Y., 2016. 5 Call Centre Work: Taylorism with a Facelift.Re-Tayloring Management: Scientific Management a Century On, p.87. Waring, S.P., 2016.Taylorism transformed: Scientific management theory since 1945. UNC Press Books. Friedman, J., 2004. Globalization.A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, pp.179-197. Friedman, T., 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the globalized world in the 21st century.London: Allen Lane. Guillotin, B. and Mangematin, V., 2015. Internationalization Strategies of Business Schools: How Flat Is the World?.Thunderbird International Business Review,57(5), pp.343-357. Peters, M.E., 2015. Open trade, Closed Borders Immigration in the era of Globalization.World Politics,67(1), pp.114-154.